Why Do Most Democrat Judges Let Criminals Go Free?
Question by L: Why do most democrat judges let criminals go free?
Even when the authority’s have enough evidence that a criminal has been convicted of a certain crime, the judges still let them go free.
Does Fox News count as a “source”?
Wow! So much dislike towards me. But please don’t be mad at me but be mad at the truth.
Best answer:
Answer by gooddwill
I’d like to see your statistics on this, please.
Sounds like bashing to me, unsubstantiated, etc.
*** Fox news? Are you serious?
Fine, show us these statistics, even if they do come from such a reliable source as Fox News.
Answer by AmericanPatriot
Because their base can’t vote from jail, and they’d do anything to get voters so they can win in ’08.
2013 Chevrolet Silverado 1500 Springdale AR Fayetteville, AR #4GT3061A — http://www.crainbuickgmcofspringdale.com/ Phone: 479-361-4654 Year: 2013 Make: Chevrolet Model: Silverado 1500 Trim: LT Engine: 5.3L Vortec 1000 VVT V8 SFI F…
More Drug Rehabs In Arkansas Information…
28 Responses to Why Do Most Democrat Judges Let Criminals Go Free?
Leave a Reply
I would have to see proof of that. i am a republican but I don’t know how you would know that or where you get your statics’s.
your OPINION is irrelevant. show us some source
because dems are idiotic
Why do republican presidents pardon criminals and let them go free?
facts to back this statement up please, also please supply data that show’s republican judges convict everyone ( when for the most part juries do). Or are you pulling this out of your @ss?
Please provide evidence to back up your ignorance.
Because they have yet to figure out that a slap on the wrist is worthless and that many of the programs to send certain types of people through rehabilitation are just as worthless.
The victims are always the ones who end up suffering, while the bleeding hearts hurt for the ones who commit the crimes.
But not our Scooter! Our President Bush had to commute his sentence.
because the ACLU own’s them
Because every time one gets in front of them, they find themselves thinking, ‘There but for the grace of God, go I.’
And for the most part, they’re right.
Do you have stats to back up your claim?
because that’s what the liberal Democrat stands for!!
Present facts before you bitch.
They must not live in Arkansas. Our last Democrat judge ended up being the biggest criminal in the county and he never let anybody off. He’s no longer a judge anymore after his last DWI and stint in drug rehab. He’s a sorry hypocrite b@st@rd! By the way I am THE ALL AMERICAN!!!! Democrats are the huge majority in Arkansas.
Shove your thumbs down where the sun don’t shine!
I see your point. You are really making a point, throwing out such a softball question. But, I shall smack the ball over the proverbial fence. Here goes:
The answer is simple. Democrats=soft on crime. Republicans=tough on crime. That’s why we elect so many more Republican judges.
Further, Democrats tend to sympathize with the criminals (poor environment, bad parenting, blah, blah, blah). Republicans sympathize with the victims (you did the crime, now do the time). Republicans realize that no matter what “economic or social” conditions “caused” the person to turn to crime, he or she is still responsible for his or her actions.
Have a great day.
I find it intriguing that the conservative responses to this question are nothing more than hurled insults, barbs and juvenile indignities. Yet, not one conservative (including the Asker) was able to submit any documentation to substantiate the Asker’s outlandish claim.
Which leads me to believe the Asker’s claim is bogus.
-RKO- 08/13//07
They’re being very nice to the republican criminals 😉
The USA has something like 8% of the worlds population and 1/3 of the world’s prison population.
So no one is going free. People are getting locked up for anything and everything.
Democrats will do anything to undermine the United States.
Where is your evidence? In this country someone is innocent until proven guilty. Are you someone with an intimate expert knowledge of evidence and facts? Mebbe the real question is why ‘Publican judges disallow testimony that would show that the Defendant is innocent? Broad brushes paint with two sides….
they are left wing igits
Professional Courtesy?
Another open fanasy of yours, devoid of facts. you continue to spout your infantile tirade.
“Even when the authority’s have enough evidence that a criminal has been convicted of a certain crime, the judges still let them go free.” How stupid are you? So you say they are let go after they are convicted…of what j-walking. where is your evidence?
Another stupefying question posted by a right wing republican McCarthy-type sympathizer which is devoid of facts and, like his hero in our white house, reality challenged…
Why do 5 radical judges allow the traitors in the White House to remain in power?
That’s a load of crap. If you have a citation – not just a soure with somebody spewing their belief, but some kind of wide-reaching study from a respected independent source – post it. But of course you don’t.
They believe in rehabilitation more than they believe in following the law.
I’m for this new social program (yep, I’d pay taxes for what I’m about to propose…it’ll never happen though) where all the early releases…particularly the sexual predators…get to live in the property next door to the judge that releases them. We could make the homes to the left and right of the judge “board and cares” or “halfway houses”.
No fox news does not count as a source, they are much too partisan.
You need to find a link from a legit source, not partisan, in order to back up your claim, which you have not done.
Then you need to find out why those were let go. Pehaps because the judges were following the constitution?
Look it up, then get back.
Peace
Jim
.